We use cookies or similar technologies to improve user experience, analyze website traffic, enable and maintain log-in and personalization settings, connections with selected partners and for marketing purposes (managing advertising space and recommend products of interest to you). You can block or adjust saving cookies at any time, by changing the settings of your web browser. By continuing to use this website without disabling cookies in your web browser you ‘ACCEPT’ saving cookies. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.

This Just In: Significant 2023 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

Product ID: CA3543W
Presented By: State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE

Breaking news

This Just In: Significant 2023 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions will provide you with in-depth analysis and insights into some of the year’s most interesting and important Supreme Court cases, including:

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
The owner of a graphic design firm in Colorado wants to expand her business to include websites for weddings, but she would refuse to design websites for same-sex weddings. Does a state law prohibiting businesses from discriminating based on sexual orientation violate the business owner’s right to free speech under the First Amendment?

Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh
After a U.S. citizen, Nohemi Gonzalez, was killed during a terrorist attack in Paris, ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack in a YouTube video. Gonzalez’s father sued Google (the owner of YouTube) and other online platforms, claiming that they aided and abetted international terrorism by allowing ISIS to use YouTube to recruit, plan attacks, and issue threats. Explore the reasoning behind the Court’s decision rejecting claims that Google and Twitter were liable for the terrorist attacks.

Read More ↓

Interested in sponsoring this program? Find out more.

Select a Format

OnDemand seminar

Pricing

Member $249.00

Non-Member $329.00

Credits

4 CLE

Date and Time

Wednesday, June 28, 20238:30 AM - 12:15 PM CT

Add to Calendar 6/28/2023 8:30:00 AM 6/28/2023 12:15:00 PM America/Chicago This Just In: Significant 2023 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

Breaking news

This Just In: Significant 2023 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions will provide you with in-depth analysis and insights into some of the year’s most interesting and important Supreme Court cases, including:

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
The owner of a graphic design firm in Colorado wants to expand her business to include websites for weddings, but she would refuse to design websites for same-sex weddings. Does a state law prohibiting businesses from discriminating based on sexual orientation violate the business owner’s right to free speech under the First Amendment?

Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh
After a U.S. citizen, Nohemi Gonzalez, was killed during a terrorist attack in Paris, ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack in a YouTube video. Gonzalez’s father sued Google (the owner of YouTube) and other online platforms, claiming that they aided and abetted international terrorism by allowing ISIS to use YouTube to recruit, plan attacks, and issue threats. Explore the reasoning behind the Court’s decision rejecting claims that Google and Twitter were liable for the terrorist attacks.

aagOTNdBczOPpqCrTmAF60877

No longer available, please choose from options above.

Maximum quantity must be less than or equal to 1.

Breaking news

This Just In: Significant 2023 U.S. Supreme Court Decisions will provide you with in-depth analysis and insights into some of the year’s most interesting and important Supreme Court cases, including:

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
The owner of a graphic design firm in Colorado wants to expand her business to include websites for weddings, but she would refuse to design websites for same-sex weddings. Does a state law prohibiting businesses from discriminating based on sexual orientation violate the business owner’s right to free speech under the First Amendment?

Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh
After a U.S. citizen, Nohemi Gonzalez, was killed during a terrorist attack in Paris, ISIS claimed responsibility for the attack in a YouTube video. Gonzalez’s father sued Google (the owner of YouTube) and other online platforms, claiming that they aided and abetted international terrorism by allowing ISIS to use YouTube to recruit, plan attacks, and issue threats. Explore the reasoning behind the Court’s decision rejecting claims that Google and Twitter were liable for the terrorist attacks.

Read More ↓

Ari Z. Cohn
TechFreedom
Chicago, IL

Laura A. Dunek
University of Wisconsin System Administration
Madison

Patrick C. Elliott
Freedom From Religion Foundation
Madison

Richard M. Esenberg
Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty
Milwaukee

David Greene
Electronic Frontier Foundation
San Francisco, CA

Dr. Howard Schweber
University of Wisconsin Department of Political Science
Madison

8:30 a.m. : Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina and President & Fellows of Harvard College

• Affirmative-Action

Laura A. Dunek

9:10 a.m. : Biden v. Nebraska and Department of Education v. Brown

• Governmental powers/Student Loan Forgiveness

Richard M. Esenberg

9:50 a.m. 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

  • •Free Speech/Discrimnation

Patrick C. Elliott

10:30 a.m. : Break

10:45 a.m. : Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh

  • Technology Liability

Ari Cohn, David Greene

11:25 a.m. A Look at What This Means

Dr. Howard Schweber

12:15 p.m. Program Concludes

  • Get insights and analysis on major U.S. Supreme Court cases from 2023
  • Assess the validity of state laws prohibiting discrimination by businesses
  • Find out whether online platforms can be liable for allowing terrorist groups to use their services
  • Debate the validity of the Biden administration’s student loan forgiveness plan
  • Hear predictions about what factors may be used in college admissions policies going forward
  • Civil rights lawyers
  • Constitutional lawyers
  • Appellate lawyers
  • Technology lawyers
  • General practitioners

BOOK BONUS

Wisconsin Attorney’s Desk Reference

Save 20% on either a 1-year subscription to the Books UnBound title or purchase of the print book.* Perfect as a primer, a refresher, or a starting point, the Desk Reference is a user-friendly guide for any attorney who needs quick answers or an introduction to an area of law. Use discount code CA3443 when you order online or by calling (800) 728-7788.

*Discount applies to both print and digital Books UnBound editions of this title and cannot be applied to previous purchases. Offer valid through 12/31/24. For Books UnBound users, discount may be applied to purchase of individual Books UnBound title only and may not be used on purchase of libraries. Discount cannot be combined with any other offers.

0 Customer Reviews
5 star
0%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%

Customer Reviews

Share your thoughts with other customers by being the first to review this product and or seminar.