We use cookies or similar technologies to improve user experience, analyze website traffic, enable and maintain log-in and personalization settings, connections with selected partners and for marketing purposes (managing advertising space and recommend products of interest to you). You can block or adjust saving cookies at any time, by changing the settings of your web browser. By continuing to use this website without disabling cookies in your web browser you ‘ACCEPT’ saving cookies. Learn more in our Privacy Policy.

Money, Recusal, and the Integrity of State Courts: Understanding Campaign Finance in Judicial Elections 2026

Product ID: CA3920R3
Presented By: State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE

Campaigning for the court

Campaign donations influence how state judicial elections unfold, raising important questions about how judges are chosen and who finances their paths to the bench. Wisconsin’s last two Supreme Court races broke national spending records,1 sharpening the debate over influence and impartiality.2 When campaign cash plays such a significant role, does it cast doubt on the courts’ ability to remain impartial? 

Dollars and decisions

Money, Recusal, and the Integrity of State Courts: Understanding Campaign Finance in Judicial Elections offers a comprehensive look at the legal, ethical, and policy considerations surrounding campaign finance in state judicial races. You’ll examine the evolution of judicial selection systems and the constitutional boundaries that determine what states may regulate regarding contributions, independent expenditures, and candidate activity. 

Read More ↓

Interested in sponsoring this program? Find out more.

Pricing

Member $109.00

Non-Member $159.00

Credits

1 CLE

Date and Time

Monday, January 26, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM CT

Add to Calendar 1/26/2026 12:00:00 PM 1/26/2026 1:00:00 PM America/Chicago Money, Recusal, and the Integrity of State Courts: Understanding Campaign Finance in Judicial Elections 2026

Campaigning for the court

Campaign donations influence how state judicial elections unfold, raising important questions about how judges are chosen and who finances their paths to the bench. Wisconsin’s last two Supreme Court races broke national spending records,1 sharpening the debate over influence and impartiality.2 When campaign cash plays such a significant role, does it cast doubt on the courts’ ability to remain impartial? 

Dollars and decisions

Money, Recusal, and the Integrity of State Courts: Understanding Campaign Finance in Judicial Elections offers a comprehensive look at the legal, ethical, and policy considerations surrounding campaign finance in state judicial races. You’ll examine the evolution of judicial selection systems and the constitutional boundaries that determine what states may regulate regarding contributions, independent expenditures, and candidate activity. 

aagOTNdBczOPpqCrTmAF60877

No longer available, please choose from options above.

Maximum quantity must be less than or equal to 1.

Campaigning for the court

Campaign donations influence how state judicial elections unfold, raising important questions about how judges are chosen and who finances their paths to the bench. Wisconsin’s last two Supreme Court races broke national spending records,1 sharpening the debate over influence and impartiality.2 When campaign cash plays such a significant role, does it cast doubt on the courts’ ability to remain impartial? 

Dollars and decisions

Money, Recusal, and the Integrity of State Courts: Understanding Campaign Finance in Judicial Elections offers a comprehensive look at the legal, ethical, and policy considerations surrounding campaign finance in state judicial races. You’ll examine the evolution of judicial selection systems and the constitutional boundaries that determine what states may regulate regarding contributions, independent expenditures, and candidate activity. 

Read More ↓

Sara C. Benesh is Professor of Political Science and currently serves as Director of Curriculum & Governance and Secretary of the College of Letters and Science at the University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee. She earned her PhD in 1999 from Michigan State University, has authored numerous studies on judicial behavior at all levels, and has been recognized as a Distinguished Undergraduate Teacher. Professor Benesh’s research currently focuses mostly on questions of institutional legitimacy. She teaches courses on the Supreme Court, law and society, law and popular culture, and civil rights and civil liberties. She loves to work with graduate and undergraduate students on research and is excited to present one such project, started while Attorney Benjamin Edelstein was her MA student. 

Benjamin D. Edelstein is an associate attorney in the Madison office of Hawks Quindel, S.C., where he practices plaintiff-side labor and employment law. He frequently represents individual workers in wrongful discharge and employment discrimination claims. Attorney Edelstein is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (B.A. 2015; M.A. 2018) and Marquette University Law School (J.D. 2022). During graduate school, Professor Benesh was his thesis advisor, and the work they began together became the basis of this CLE presentation.

  • Explore the legal framework governing campaign contributions and recusal
  • Understand how recusal and disclosure rules function as practical safeguards for judicial integrity
  • Survey different state approaches to recusal and disclosure requirements in connection with campaign finance regulations
  • Examine empirical findings on how recusal standards impact campaign fundraising and donor behavior
  • Enhance your ability to assess current state practices and potential campaign finance reforms
  • Election law attorneys
  • Constitutional lawyers
  • Civil rights lawyers
  • Government lawyers
  • Appellate lawyers
  • Public interest lawyers
0 Customer Reviews
5 star
0%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%

Customer Reviews

Share your thoughts with other customers by being the first to review this product and or seminar.