Schedule
Subrogation meets Choice of Law
Carrie L. Devitt, Phillip C. Theesfeld
Motion in Limine to Prohibit Evidence of the Plaintiff’s History of Smoking and Cigarette Use
Danielle M. Schroder, Patricia E. Putney
- From the plaintiff’s perspective – Keep it out!
o Not relevant
o More prejudicial than probative
o Stigma of smoking and negative perception by jury
o Role of expert testimony
o Supportive law for exclusion of the evidence - From the defense perspective – Bring it in!
o Relevant
o Prejudice does not outweigh probative value
o Effects of smoking on health in many ways
o Role of expert testimony
o Medical literature/learned treatise use
o Supportive law for admission of the evidence
Break
Motion Ruling & Panel Discussion
All faculty
Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiff from Introducing Possibility Testimony
Corey G. Lorenz, Brian D. Anderson
- Limit plaintiffs testimony to probability testimony
Motion Ruling & Panel Discussion
All faculty
Program Concludes
Motion Ruling & Panel Discussion
All faculty